68ragtop
Well-Known Member
I have learned from reading so many posts here that the cranks on the 951's are over powered & shouldn't be expected to run more than 200 hours. Makes sense. For you guys rebuilding them often, what are you finding are their weakness's? I assume needle bearings? I would also assume that failure of these cranks is tightly related to moisture exposure over time.
I was planning on installing a rebuilt crank on this 951 I am building, but as I am checking & cleaning it. I am not finding anything wrong with it. I cleaned all the bearings & do not see any rust, putting, or discoloration on any off the balls or rollers. Deflection is under .001" there is no rod end play, they are straight & axial specs are within new range. Bearings spin quiet, & balls are spotless. If I had never heard of common crank failures, I would be reinstalling this crank with complete confidence.
The ski, has 128 hours on it, however I am not sure if this has been replaced before or not.
Thanks for the info, 68RT
I was planning on installing a rebuilt crank on this 951 I am building, but as I am checking & cleaning it. I am not finding anything wrong with it. I cleaned all the bearings & do not see any rust, putting, or discoloration on any off the balls or rollers. Deflection is under .001" there is no rod end play, they are straight & axial specs are within new range. Bearings spin quiet, & balls are spotless. If I had never heard of common crank failures, I would be reinstalling this crank with complete confidence.
The ski, has 128 hours on it, however I am not sure if this has been replaced before or not.
Thanks for the info, 68RT