• This site contains eBay affiliate links for which Sea-Doo Forum may be compensated.

major service bulletin on all seadoo 300s

Status
Not open for further replies.

ryffish

Premium Member
Premium Member
I just heard about this bulletin today dealer said seadoo put it out on the 20th of Oct the supercharger impeller needs to be replaced . I guess they are having problems with them disintegrating and damaging engine I posted a picture of bulletin . All you guys that put tunes in better take em out
209.jpg
 
About mid year ish they changed the impeller. The difference is they shaved down the long veins between the other veins. I saw a company doing a test to see if they are loosing boost because of the change.
 
I wonder what there replacing it with ? Because there doing the recall on mine I had to leave it
 
I am kind of upset about it I kind of thought seadoo did there homework on this one
 
They were too thin too long and too brittle ? I wonder if the 2017s have the new style impeller
 
This is quite shocking, really. I worked in an engineering company many years ago, and newly designed units are supposed to undergo extensive testing before being released. In other words, the new superchargers are supposed to undergo "real life" engine wear and tear testing for thousands of hours under many conditions before being released to the public. Could be that the manufacturer screwed up by not making the material up to spec, but that's only guessing. This is why so many of us wait for the second year before buying units with significant changes. You've got to wonder if Bombardier would release this type of junk on their aerospace vehicles, or if they just don't care about people stuck in the ocean 10 miles offshore with a damaged engine. It took BRP almost a decade to shed their bad reputation because of their previous supercharger design disaster; I wonder how long it'll take them to shed this blunder.
 
As a long time mechanic/improviser/handyman/jack of all trades/welder/repairman, I can say this about things that have defects:

If its a computer program, or a vacuum cleaner, engine, paint spray gun hose adapter, tire, advertisement, etc, they all have the same purpose. The purpose is to make money. Many of these companies calculate the exact time to release the product. They know that further testing would always be better, but you need to decide when its time to test the market and see the sales results before you spend ten years on the R&D. Another quality issue is that the company is trying to product the least expensive model, with the highest wholesale price. Its interesting to see production taking place, and they are using a very inferior part just to save $0.04 per unit. They constantly try to replace little pieces with cheaper versions. Once the retail locations are established, they can make money off of repairing the cheap parts that fail quickly. You want the parts to last a little longer than the warranty does. Once the warranty is up, repairs are just good business. And an opportunity to get your product as trade in on a new version.

Anyway, most people don't see sales from the company point of view. The company wants to use what ever method produces the most profitability, period. Building a very reliable product and selling it super cheap is going to result in low profits, and lack of interest in the company from a profitability point of view. You wont have investors, and you wont have distributors. If you can build a cheap product that has huge profitability, and service/maintenance is the bread and butter, then you will grow and make big money. People will be interested in getting involved on the sales and distribution end of the business, because of all the money that can be made.
 
When ever you go over 100 hp /l your pushing the engine and technology. 200 hp /l is to me like in some experimental race class . I think engines like this should be buy at your risk . I wonder how much money owners of new non supercharged engines are paying indirectly for these problems . I am getting about 110 hp / l out of my v-tech tuned engine which is fair enough. Maybe the original 185 hp for the original sc Sea-Doo was fair enough keeping in mind it takes some hp to drive that 2nd pump in line with your engine for long term use but just guessing .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damn, gotta deal with service guys again. I had a MY 2014 car that sat at San Diego port for six months due to engine replacement. They dropped the engine and put a new one so in comparison this is nothing. The only hassle is taking it in and picking it up.
 
Is there a way to check the Vin online to see if we have the new wheel installed or not? I was told my ski was made later in the year and had the coolant hose clamp and valve cover bolt fix already done when it was built.
 
Called service and sure enough mine is on the list. I just got the tx 300 in August. Service could not order the parts as it's not available yet, so why BRP issues recall if they dont have parts? uuuurrrrrr
 
my dealer told me a week but I'm not gonna leave it there if parts are backordered.
 
Personally, when I went to buy my Seadoo, there were a couple of things that made me decide on the GTR 215 over the 300. Gas mileage was one since I plan on fishing off of mine. But two, the 300 simply hasn't been on the market long enough to work out the issues. Just like a new vehicle, I wait a few years before buying a model I like to get the bugs worked out. Price wasn't a concern for me on this purchase. But the many years the 215 has been out is what made me decide on it.

Good luck to those of you affected by this!!
 
For the first time, I decided to buy my toys new, a 2015 RZR and now the 300. Both with less than a year on them already have warranty issues. Such a PITA from both Polaris and Sea Doo. For one my RZR is all decked out, programmer and all and I dont want these service morons even touching it. The 300 is less than 3 months old, not a single scratch on the thing and I know I wont get it back in the same condition :facepalm:
 
More SC headaches

I appears that these new superchargers have some kind of rotation balance issue that must be addressed when installed . At 50,000 revs/min , it makes work on such units more demanding requiring grater precision that maybe not everyone may get. I read something about BRP grinding down the adjustment nuts that sounds kind of jury rigged .

Also some say their may be a 2 psi loss with the new blade configuration which may turn the RXT-300 to a RXT-280 but its not been confirmed .
 
I heard that theory but it is not true because only the early year 300s have the supercharger issue
 
Yep i e mailed brp with my vin. Mine was a later make and not affected. My ski runs like it should.
 
Just talked to dealer I'm just gonna wait til next year's riding season to get sc impeller done parts are back ordered til end of Nov. Riding season for me is officially over til next year
 
Mine just got done today . I been hearing talk around Forums that they don't trust these techs well I'm gonna defend them if your dealership has a tech that didn't graduate or go to BRP school . you are,a fool for letting him work on your 300 in the first place . I personally asked to see his diploma from BRP school before he touched my ski . I also found out that it costs a reputable dealership a whole lot of money to send there techs there and not everyone gets to. go .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top