So im pulling all these skis apart and noticed something. They all have somewhat different pumps and im curious which one may be the better pump.
The ski I purchased to rebuild and keep was the 1997 spx with a 787 and vts
The others are a 1994 spx with no vts and a 657 and a 1995 xp with a 717 with vts
the xp has what I think is a solid aluminum housing and some sort of extension against the hull. Its a good 4 inches longer than the rest when you add in the extension
the 1994 spx does not have the extension and is aluminum
the 1997 spx is much like the 1994 size wise but is some sort of plastic or epoxy and has a really long nose cone
Curious if I should try to swap for the longer xp aluminum pump if possible. Guessing its not possible as it requires longer studs in the hull but I thought I would ask
also curious if all new pumps are some sort of composite ???
thanks
The ski I purchased to rebuild and keep was the 1997 spx with a 787 and vts
The others are a 1994 spx with no vts and a 657 and a 1995 xp with a 717 with vts
the xp has what I think is a solid aluminum housing and some sort of extension against the hull. Its a good 4 inches longer than the rest when you add in the extension
the 1994 spx does not have the extension and is aluminum
the 1997 spx is much like the 1994 size wise but is some sort of plastic or epoxy and has a really long nose cone
Curious if I should try to swap for the longer xp aluminum pump if possible. Guessing its not possible as it requires longer studs in the hull but I thought I would ask
also curious if all new pumps are some sort of composite ???
thanks